Saturday, July 15, 2006

My trip to the MoMA

Today's Saturday adventure was to see the MoMA, or the Museum of Modern Art.

Yeah, I know what you're thinking. Modern art is really not my thing at all. Frankly, I was pretty skeptical. However, there was an exhibit I was wanting to see that's on special display. The display on the top floor is that of Dadaist art.

Politically and philosophically, it's definitely not my thing. The movement was very anti-structure, anti-aesthetics, and frankly anti-art. The Dadaists strove to be against all convention, form, and tradition. In doing so, they came up with some insanely absurd art.

However, it was actually pretty enjoyable to view.


Here's a look at the building. It's on 53rd Street between 5th and 6th avenues. It has five floors inside, but it's certainly more than five stories tall. Today admission was free, so that tells you something about the choice of days.


The above piece was by Ernst, a German. The movement started up simultaneously in New York City and Zurich. Disenfranchised by World War I, the two groups started the art movement independently, and largely without realizing the other was doing the same thing. This piece shows the structure so despised by the Dadaists. The idea was to create a machine that looks structured on the surface, but is obviously without function or stability. The Dadaists viewed the world as without redemption, and as an empty facade of structure and rules.


Creating themeless, unstructured art was their goal. However, the idea seems in my estimation to be like trying to empty your head of thoughts. When you try to not think about anything, you simply end up thinking about NOT thinking. That's what I kept thinking while viewing this... The artists became so consumed with their anti-art that they started factions, fights, and debates over what exactly their non-art should be.

In one case, an artist had a machine pick out letters and symbols at random. He then recorded himself saying the series of characters. A recording was playing next to a selection of letters. It sounded something like this, "ahhh-da-da-daaa... uh-uhhh, bah! bah! bah!" When he came across a symbol, like that of a hand pointing or a square, he would make whatever sound he thought that symbol represented. Pretty bizarre, if you ask me. The idea was to de-structure language to such an extreme degree that only true human emotion was involved, with no pretextualized ideas, associated with words. However, all I heard was "ba-ba-baahhh, laaaa".


Another big part of the Dadaist movement was that of photo collages. They'd take post cards, bank notes, or every day items like screws, tiles and lace, and put them together in very attractive fashions. However, it's almost as if they got worried that their 'anti-art' was becoming too artistic. Notice that in the picture above, the artist included the word "dada" in big letters, as if to convince viewers and himself that this was nihilistic anti-art they were involved with!

The last piece I'll show you is a painting done in Berlin. Frustrated with the nationalistic, autocratic pride they thought existed, they pictured those in the machine as machines themselves. "1 2 3 Hurrah" flows the text from the character on the right. The Iron Cross, and German flag make this work very easy to read, which I liked. Some of the art in the exhibit was just too plain bizarre to even interpret.

A faction of Dadaists who called themselves "Stupid"... (I'm not making this up) decided that much of Dadaist art was too vague, cryptic and weird to do any good. They decided that since their goals of Marxist revolution needed action, they should engage in more forceful art. One piece was an outright advertisement for Lenin in Cyrillic characters.

However, I really enjoyed what I saw of the museum. Classical art will always be my favorite, but today was definitely fun.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Another busy day...

(Pre-script: If you haven't read the entry following this one, please make sure and catch yourself up. I've updated twice in these two days, so if you only check the blog a couple times a week, there's more below you haven't read)

Another busy day at WABC... The mini war between Israel and Lebanon made for a packed news day today. Oil's soaring, Valerie Plame is suing, and US/French relations were souring...

I stayed a little late in the office today, pouring over six news sources/engines at the same time. Being a part of the machine that runs a talk show with 517 affiliates is really, really exciting on a day like today.

I had a good talk with James as well today. He's an extremely personable person, very intense, analytical, and genuinely nice. I think having the interns around to assemble, highlight and comment on news copy helps him out a lot as well, so he was kind enough to buy me lunch today. Thanks, James!

Those of you who know me well know that I love to insert humor into anything that I can... A few weeks ago, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was taking hundred-point losses day after day. Each day, the news analysts would have some reason for the Dow tanking. On a Tuesday, they'd say that the Dow fell because of rising oil prices... Wednesday, they'd say that the Dow fell because of FALLING oil prices.

I came to the quick realization that there's a distinct and complex system that market analysts use for determining why the markets rise or fall...

They make it up on the spot.

Yep, I'm nearly certain of it. Oil is a fun and convenient commodity to blame when making up your response. However, it's a tad cliched, and the more dashing newsman will, of course, come up with something more exciting to pin market movement on.

Considering myself to be just dashing enough a newsman to come up with something fun, I gave it a go. I announced to Bruce Anderson (an elderly gentleman, and veteran news reporter) that the market dropped 25 points on news of a new Hillary Clinton pantsuit. The next day, I said that it had gained 63 points when my left kneecap's third quarter profits were higher than analysts had expected.

Fun times, but now I'm expected nearly daily to come up with the impetus for dramatic market change.

Today was "Magic beans". I announced to those who asked that this mideast business, or oil prices had nothing to do with a bad market day. Ireland's harvest of magic beans was decided by a local cereal-toting leprachaun to be "magically delicious".

The other intern, Jeff, printed me out directions to The Onion's headquarters here in NYC, and told me to take a job with them.

Okay, that's all for today. I'm tired, and after checking up with Mr. Matt Drudge just now, I'm realizing that tomorrow's going to be just as busy a news day.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Brett has left the keyboard.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

My Gorbachev idea

It was a good day at work today. Every once in awhile, I start to feel a little irrelevant with all the rote tasks that an operation such as this would naturally put on an intern.

However, today was gladly different. Mr. Hannity was in today, and so I worked with "Sweet Baby James" to assemble the media packet. I've talked a lot about this process before, but I suppose I should go into some detail about it now.

The media packet is a fairly large bundle of papers that we assemble with the day's news and commentary. I'd guess all-in-all, it's between 100 and 150 pages each day. As a team, we scour the major papers (NYT, WP, LAT, CT), news conglomeration sites (Drudge, Lucianne, Google), and political commentary sites (Townhall, RealClearPolitics, Newsmax, Human Events, etc) There isn't a specified goal for what to print out and pass along. However, you'll do much better at this job if you have a good feel for what would be exciting to hear about on the air, and what's relevant. Catching points of hypocrisy in political opponents earns you extra points. (Remember my "carbon footprint" line about Al Gore?)

So, let me guide you through how my brain processed the day, as I'm looking over roughly 1,000 articles, I have to decide what's salient and worth passing on, or risk having James raise an eyebrow at my work, and toss it away. To start things off, you have to consider what has gone on the show recently, and what recurring themes might be desired. So, things like WMDs, eminent domain abuse, Duke lacrosse, and congressional democrat hijinks are always good, provided the story is interesting. However, you have to have a good feel for what's going on in the world.

For instance, today is a very "international" news day. Iran was re-referred to the UN Security Council, and news also broke that Iranians were present for the recent N. Korean missile launches. Renewed violence in Iraq, an Israeli push into Lebanon, and French interference at the UN. On a day like today, Robert Novak's revelation in his most recent column probably takes something of a back burner. However, it's still relevant because liberal callers will want to try and find cracks in the argument.

So I print out material, and if I want to highlight good quotes, or scratch notes on printed pieces for relevancy, I do so.

Today, a piece came up on Gorbachev. The basic gist of the story is that Comrade Mikhail is criticizing the USA for "winners disease" saying we're too pushy in Russian Politics. He asked us if we "really thought we were smarter than the Russians", to which I scribbled an emboldened "YES" in my notes. I brought my notes to James, and told him why I thought this was such a good story. A few hours later, as audio of Gorbachev's translated words came across the ABC News lines, I caught James' attention, and we grabbed Greg to get the audio.

Greg said, "Okay, but what's the relevancy here?"

Remember when I said that I felt irrelevant to the show process some days?

Not today! Sean spent 15 minutes talking about this story I brought to James' attention. Whee!

Here's a clip I took from today's show. Enjoy, and keep sending me feedback! I love hearing from you.

Monday, July 10, 2006

62nd Street

If you caught any national news today, you heard about the building collapse here in NYC. As the alleged story goes, a doctor who held a practice (and lived) in this building was going through a divorce, and was going to have to sell the building. Rather than have his ex-wife get anything out of the process, he planned to blow up the building, and commit suicide in the same act.

He survived the blast which crumbled the building, and guided firemen to his location in the rubble via cellphone. Happily, no one was killed in the blast, and as it wasn't a massive building, there were only a few injuries. The place was listed to sell with an estimated value of > $5 million.

After work, I figured I'd have a better chance of getting up close to the scene. Here's what I found:

(Click on any photo or any movie for a look.)

































I'm fine.

The building that collapsed in NYC today was a full 50 blocks north of me today. It's 9:45 AM, and frankly, I awoke to the news by my Mom calling and asking if I was alright.

I'm going to dress now, and go and see if I can take video or pictures. Don't expect much, the TV News crews are reporting that they can't get close.

But that's the obnoxious reporter in me, I guess.
Free Counters
Online Degree